Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Pa...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna v. Sri Dipesh Chandak, Son Of Mahabir Pd. Chandak

High Court 04 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna v. Sri Dipesh Chandak, Son Of Mahabir Pd. Chandak
Date of order
04 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna v. Sri Dipesh Chandak, Son Of Mahabir Pd. Chandak, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: In such circumstances, we find no reason to Bibhash/Shiv U entertain the appeal and we dismiss it based on the litigationpolicy.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

25 04-12-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.409 of 2008 ====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna. ... ... Appellant/s Versus Sri Dipesh Chandak, son of Mahabir Pd. Chandak, 234/3A, AJC Bose Road,FMC, Fortuna, 5[th] Floor, R.No. 414, Kolkata- 700020... ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Ms. Archana Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Anshuman Singh, CGC Mr. Sanat Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. We are told that a number of appeals were filed which were rejected by this Court on the ground of monetarylimit as per the notification dated 08.08.2019, which is thelitigation policy framed by the Central Government. As perthe notification, the Department is disabled from filing anyappeal to the High Court, the status of which are below thelimit of Rs. 1 crore. 2. We see that in the present case also, in the case of the assessee, who is the sole respondent, as is seen from thevarious grounds of appeal, the objections are with respect toadditions which totally would be less than Rs. 1 crore. 3. In such circumstances, we find no reason to Bibhash/Shiv U entertain the appeal and we dismiss it based on the litigationpolicy. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan