Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Sri Pravin Kumar Rohtas
High Court
04 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Sri Pravin Kumar Rohtas
Date of order
04 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Sri Pravin Kumar Rohtas, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6750 of 2012
====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Sri Pravin Kumar Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAINORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)3 04-09-2013 None for the petitioner. Misc. Appeal 503 of 2006 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 24.9.2010 till 6.12.2010. The restoration application itself was filed on 19.12.2012. We have gone through the application for restoration. There is no sufficient explanation for our satisfaction with regard to inordinate delay in filing of the restoration application itself. The restoration application is dismissed.
Misc. Appeal 503 of 2006 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 24.9.2010 till 6.12.2010. The restoration application itself was filed on 19.12.2012.
We have gone through the application for restoration. There is no sufficient explanation for our satisfaction with regard to inordinate delay in filing of the restoration application itself.
(Navin Sinha, J)
Chandran
(Vikash Jain, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.