Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C
High Court
09 Feb 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C
Date of order
09 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3701 of 2010
======================================================
Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Central, Patna
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
Takshila Education Society, C-565, 2nd floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi and also at Kashi Place, Dak Bunglow, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Rastogi, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGHand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDIORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH)
4 09-02-2012
Heard the parties.
For the reasons mentioned in this application, the prayer for restoration is allowed and M.A. No.330 of 2006 is restored to its original file. No notice need be issued upon the sole respondent in the Miscellaneous Appeal because admittedly Vakalatnama has been filed on its behalf.
(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
sk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue