Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C
High Court
27 Nov 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C
Date of order
27 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna v. Takshila Education Society, C, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: The present appeals filed by the Revenue against such orders are, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.332 of 2006
======================================================
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellant Versus .... .... Assessee/Respondent
Takshila Education Society, C-565, IInd Floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi, as at Kashi Place, Dak Bunglow, Patna
======================================================
with
Miscellaneous Appeal No.330 of 2006
======================================================
Commissioner of Income Tax. Central; Patna
.... .... Assessing Officer/Appellant Versus
Takshila Educational Society, C-565, IInd floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi, also at Kashi Place, Dak Bunglow, Patna
.... .... Assessee/Respondent
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGHORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
18 27-11-2015
It is submitted by learned counsels for the parties that the order of reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has itself been quashed by the Tribunal by its order dated 30.11.2009 holding that the AO had assumed jurisdiction in an illegal manner and, therefore, the re-assessment framed on 28.3.2003 was illegal and bad in law as the same was void ab initio and the said order of the Tribunal had been affirmed by this Court by order dated 6.4.2015 passed in M.A.Nos. 277 and 278 of 2010 filed by the Revenue.
In the aforesaid circumstances, it is evident that the order
of reopening under Section 147 of the Act itself having been held to be bad in law, the orders passed in the said proceedings would also be of no avail. The present appeals filed by the Revenue against such orders are, accordingly, dismissed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Sudhir Singh, J)
spal/-
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.