In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central – Pune v. M/S.veena Developers, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.478 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – Pune..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Veena Developers
..Respondent.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra i/by Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 28[th] February, 2011.
1.admission.
By consent the appeal is restored to file and taken up for
1.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions raised in the above appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1194 of 2010 (CIT V/s. Brahma Associates) dated 22-02-2011. For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue