Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central v. Ashutosh Mohunta, J.(Oral
High Court
30 Mar 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central v. Ashutosh Mohunta, J.(Oral
Date of order
30 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Central v. Ashutosh Mohunta, J.(Oral, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
WTR No.16 of 1999DATE OF DECISION: March 30, 2010
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),...PETITIONERLUDHIANA
VERSUS
SMT. GURMAIL KAUR TRUST, LUDHIANA...RESPONDENT
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.
PRESENT: MR. KRISHAN MEHTA, SR.STANDING COUNSEL
FOR THE PETITIONER.
MR. AKSHAY BHAN, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT.
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench hasreferred the following question of law for adjudication by this Court:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theIncome-tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding thatthere is no legal infirmity insofar as this Trust is concernedand that it could not be treated as a discretionary one to beassessed as per provisions of Section 21(4) of the Wealth-taxAct, 1957?”
This very question came up for consideration before this Courtin the case of the same assessee in ITR Nos.47 to 49 of 1989 and has beenanswered against the revenue vide order dated 16.4.2004.
Accordingly, this reference is answered against the Revenueand in favour of the assessee in the same terms as ITR Nos.47 to 49 of 1989.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
JUDGE
March 30, 2010 Gulati
(MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.