Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central v. M...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central v. M/S Emmar Alloys Pvt. Ltd

High Court 28 Jan 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central v. M/S Emmar Alloys Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Jan 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central v. M/S Emmar Alloys Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In view of the statement made by the counsel appearing for the petitioner and also looking to the fact that the application preferred by the respondent before the Settlement Commissioner has been withdrawn, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI --- W.P (T) No. 1156 of 2013 --- Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) .... Petitioner Versus M/s Emmar Alloys Pvt. Ltd...........Respondent --- CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr.S.C.(R) For the Respondent :- Mr. Vinay Prakash, Advocate --- 09/ Dated 28th January, 2014per D.N. Patel, J. 1.Counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Income Tax has submitted that he has taken the instruction, and today, the order has been passed, by the Settlement Commissioner, allowing the settlement application preferred by the respondent bearing No.7/IT/652 dated 26.7.2012, which has been disposed of as withdrawn, because the respondent has prayed for withdrawal of the application. The order has also been passed in light of this order, and this writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3.In view of the statement made by the counsel appearing for the petitioner and also looking to the fact that the application preferred by the respondent before the Settlement Commissioner has been withdrawn, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (D. N. Patel, J.) (P. P. Bhatt, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan