In Commissioner Of Income Tax Central(I v. Vipin Khanna, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is, consequently, dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~106
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 72/2013
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL(I)
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC. versus
VIPIN KHANNA
Through: None.
.....Respondent
%
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R16.01.2025
1.Undisputedly, the tax effect which forms the subject matter of this appeal falls below INR 2 Crores and would thus not be liable to be continued in light of the provisions made in Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17 September 2024.
2.The appeal is, consequently, dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. The proposed questions of law are kept open to be urged and addressed in an appropriate case.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
JANUARY 16, 2025/RW
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue