Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central).Vs....

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central).Vs.shri Laxmikant Gupta v. Mohta And

High Court In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central).Vs.shri Laxmikant Gupta v. Mohta And
Date of order
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central).Vs.shri Laxmikant Gupta v. Mohta And, the High Court allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4327 OF 2008IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.84 OF 2006. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central).vs.Shri Laxmikant Gupta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's Orders orCourt'sorJudge's Ordersdirections and Registrar's orders. Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv. for the appellant.Mr.Dangre, Adv. for the legal representatives. Coram: ANOOP V. MOHTA and C. L. PANGARKAR ,JJ. Dated: 25[th] AUGUST, 2008. This is an application for raising additional ground. The appeal is not yet admitted. Considering the averements made, this application is allowed. The appellant to carryout the amendment within a week. JUDGE. JUDGE. chute 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan