Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh-I...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh-Ii v. Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-Ix Mohali

High Court 06 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh-Ii v. Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-Ix Mohali
Date of order
06 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh-Ii v. Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-Ix Mohali, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the said fact, the question of law as raisedby the Revenue stands concluded by the Judgment of this Court in Vardhman Polytext Ltd.'s case (supra) as affirmed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court in the order passed on 12.09.2012.Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: February 06, 2013ITA No. 163 of 2006 (O&M) Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh-II …Appellant Versus Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-IX Mohali …Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the appellant Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocatefor the applicant-respondent 1To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2Whether the Judgment should be reported in theDigestDigest HEMANT GUPTA, J. -CM No. 779CII of 2013 Civil Misc. Application is allowed. In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court on 12.09.2012, the appeal is being taken up todayfor final disposal. ITA No. 163 of 2006 Learned counsel for the appellant admits that theSpecial Leave Petition against the judgment of Full Bench in thecase of CIT v. Vardhman Polytex Ltd. (2008) 299 ITR 152 (P&H)(FB)stands dismissed on 12.09.2012. In view of the said fact, the question of law as raisedby the Revenue stands concluded by the Judgment of this Court in Vardhman Polytext Ltd.'s case (supra) as affirmed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court in the order passed on 12.09.2012.Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 06.02.2013Atul (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan