In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh-Ii v. Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-Ix Mohali, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the said fact, the question of law as raisedby the Revenue stands concluded by the Judgment of this Court in Vardhman Polytext Ltd.'s case (supra) as affirmed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court in the order passed on 12.09.2012.Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: February 06, 2013ITA No. 163 of 2006 (O&M)
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh-II
…Appellant
Versus
Swaraj Engineers Ltd. Phase-IX Mohali
…Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the appellant
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocatefor the applicant-respondent
1To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2Whether the Judgment should be reported in theDigestDigest
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
-CM No. 779CII of 2013
Civil Misc. Application is allowed.
In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court on 12.09.2012, the appeal is being taken up todayfor final disposal.
ITA No. 163 of 2006
Learned counsel for the appellant admits that theSpecial Leave Petition against the judgment of Full Bench in thecase of CIT v. Vardhman Polytex Ltd. (2008) 299 ITR 152 (P&H)(FB)stands dismissed on 12.09.2012.
In view of the said fact, the question of law as raisedby the Revenue stands concluded by the Judgment of this Court in
Vardhman Polytext Ltd.'s case (supra) as affirmed by Hon'ble theSupreme Court in the order passed on 12.09.2012.Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
06.02.2013Atul
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.