Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Appollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd.,Ali Towers, Iv Floor
High Court
05 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Appollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd.,Ali Towers, Iv Floor
Date of order
05 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Appollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd.,Ali Towers, Iv Floor, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
T.C.A.No.447 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHand
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.447 of 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai... Appellant
vs
Appollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd.,Ali Towers, IV Floor,55, Greams Road,Chennai - 600 006.
.. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras D Bench, dated 16.07.2012 in ITA No. 1572/Mds/2010.
For Appellant :Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For Respondent:
Ms.N.V.Lakshmi
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing Counsel,
appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment year 2001-2002 and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs.
Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesssm
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J]
05.11.2024
T.C.A.No.447 of 2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue