Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
22 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-2020
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.04.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023
Commissioner of Income TaxChennai
.. Appellant in TC(A)Nos.72 and 75 of 2025vs
M/s.Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd.,No.9, Shasthri Nagar,M.G.Road, Besant Nagar,Chennai-600 029.PAN: AAICA 3787F
.. Respondent in TC(A)Nos.72 and 75 of 2025 Appellant in T.C.(A) Nos.392 and 395 of
2025
The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 3(4)No.121, Nungambakkam High Road,Income Tax Department, Chennai.
.. Respondent in T.C.(A) Nos.392 &395 of 2025
Prayer in TC(A)Nos.72 and 392 of 2023 : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, in ITA No.402/Chny/2021 for the Assessment Year 2019-2020, dated 08.12.2021.
Prayer in TC(A)Nos.75 and 395 of 2023: Appeal filed under Section
1/4
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, in ITA No.403/Chny/2021 for the Assessment Year 2019-2020, dated 08.12.2021.
(In both TC(A)s)
For Appellant
:
Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For Respondent:Mr.S.Sridhar
COMMON JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 08.12.2021 passed in ITA.Nos.402 and 403 of 2021, the revenue has filed TC(A) Nos.72 and 75 of 2023 and the assessee has filed TC(A) Nos.392 and 395 of 2023 relating to assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20.
2. The assessee, however, despite being successful in the second appeal, has chosen to remit the outstanding tax as computed pursuant to the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and settled the matter under the on-going Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Hence, the learned counsel for the assessee states that the assesse does not pursue T.C.(A) Nos.392 and 395 of 2023.
3. In light of the same, T.C.(A) Nos.72 and 75 of 2023 are liable to be allowed and we do so. We, however, make it clear that the questions
2/4
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023
of law have not been adjudicated by us in light of the peculiar facts as
stated aforesaid and are returned unanswered.
4. T.C.(A)Nos.72 and 75 of 2023 are allowed as settled under
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and T.C.(A) Nos.392 and 395 of 2023 are
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Index:NoSpeaking OrderNeutral Citation:Yessl
[A.S.M., J] [C.K., J] 22.04.2025
ToThe Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 3(4)No.121, Nungambakkam High Road,Income Tax Department, Chennai.
3/4
4/4
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.ANDC.KUMARAPPAN,J.
sl
TC(A) Nos.72 & 75 of 2023and T.C.(A)Nos.392 and 395 of 2023
22.04.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.