Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.rasi Exports Ltd., 68C Cp Ramasamy Road Alwarpet, Chennai-108
High Court
23 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.rasi Exports Ltd., 68C Cp Ramasamy Road Alwarpet, Chennai-108
Date of order
23 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. M/S.rasi Exports Ltd., 68C Cp Ramasamy Road Alwarpet, Chennai-108, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Tax Case (Appeal) No.913 of 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai ..Appellant/AppellantVs.
M/s.Rasi Exports Ltd.,68C CP Ramasamy RoadAlwarpet, Chennai-108. ..Respondent/Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 19.3.2010 made in ITANo.1624/Mds/2009 against the order passed by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) V, Chennai 34 made in I.T.A. No. 86/2007-2008 dated 09.02.2009 and against the order passed by the IncomeTax Officer(OSD) Company Range V(3) Chennai 34 made in C.No.53038-R/2004-2005 dated 08.06.2007.
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 19.3.2010 madein ITA No.1624/Mds/2009, for the Assessment Year 2004-2005, byraising the following substantial question of law:
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right indeleting the penalty under Section 27(1)(c) when theAssessee has concealed the particulars of income?"
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SeniorStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circularinstruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxesvide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, itis stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued bythe Department before the High Court in cases where the taxeffect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases. No costs. Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circularinstruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxesvide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, itis stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued bythe Department before the High Court in cases where the taxeffect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases. No costs.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
ssk.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)VChennai -34.
3. The Income Tax Officer (OSD), Company Circle V(3), Chennai. Company Circle V(3), Chennai.
+1 CC to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate sr 88463.
+1 CC to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate sr 88358.
RR(CO)SP(20/12/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.