Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Shri Mukesh P.hemdev
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Shri Mukesh P.hemdev
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai v. Shri Mukesh P.hemdev, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.1.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.728 of 2010
Commissioner of Income TaxChennai... AppellantVersus
Shri Mukesh P.Hemdev,No.2, 1st Street,Haddows Road,Chennai 600 006... Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench, dated24.12.2009, in I.T.A.No.755/Mds/2009 against the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax (A), Chennai, dated 07.01.2009 in ITANo.38/2008-2009arising out of the order of the Income TaxOfficer, Media Ward II, Chennai 34, dated 28.12.2007 in GIR No.& PA No.AAAPH7994N, for the Assessment Year 2005-06.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenuehad submitted that they may be permitted by this Court towithdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the CircularNo.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India,dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter isless than Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionshttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)Sub Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//Sub Assistant Registrarssk.To:1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `C' Bench.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai 343. The Income Tax Officer, Media Ward II,Chennai 34.+1 cc to Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Advocate, sr.6337Tax Case Appeal No.728 of 2010
ad cokra 11.03.2016
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.