In Commissioner Of Income Tax City9 v. Crest Hotels Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: 1.By consent of parties, the order impugned inthe appeal passed by the Tribunal is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.154 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax City9....Appellant
vs.
Crest Hotels Ltd....Respondent.---
Mr.Yogesh Patki with B.M.Chatterjee, for appellant.Mr.S.S.Shetty, for Respondent.
P.C.:-
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
1.By consent of parties, the order impugned inthe appeal passed by the Tribunal is set aside. Theappeal before the Tribunal is remitted back to thetribunal for denovo consideration and decision inaccordance with law. All the points available toboth the sides are kept open. Appeal is disposed of.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue