Commissioner Of Income Tax Coimbatore v. Shri. T.s.ramanan Glo Color Labs
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Coimbatore v. Shri. T.s.ramanan Glo Color Labs
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Coimbatore v. Shri. T.s.ramanan Glo Color Labs, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.1.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.837 of 2013
Commissioner of Income TaxCoimbatore
.. Appellant /AppellantVersus
Shri. T.S.RamananGlo Color Labs115, Cross Cut RoadGandhipuramCoimbatore – 641 012
.. Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Appeal has been filed against the order of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal `D' Bench, Chennai, dated 19.2.2013 inITA No.2200/Mds/2012 against order of the Commissioner of IncomeTax Appeals-I, Coimbatore in ITA No.331/11-12 dated 6/9/12 forthe Assessment Year 2009-2010 against the order of the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax Circle II Coimbatore made inPAN/GIRNo.AAFPF1261F dated 27/12/2011 for the Assessment year2009-2010.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : Mr.J.BalachanderJ U D G M E N T
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo:1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal `D' Bench, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals-I,coimbatore.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-II,Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.J.Balachander, Advocate Sr.5720+1cc to Mr.SenthilKumar, Advocate Sr.6416Tax Case Appeal No.837 of 2013
mg(CO)srg(09/02/2016)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.