Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dehradun v. Roorkee
High Court
19 Feb 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dehradun v. Roorkee
Date of order
19 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dehradun v. Roorkee, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. _____________ RITU BAHRI, C.J. __________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, C.J. AND SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J. 19 FEBRUARY, 2024
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun. ..Appellant. Versus M/s Divine International, Chowk Bazar, Roorkee (Haridwar). ………Respondent
Roorkee
Counsel for the appellant :Mr. H.M. Bhatia. Counsel for the respondents :Mr. Arvind Vashisth, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Disha Vashisth, learned counsel for the respondent.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT : (per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
The tax effect, in the present case, is Rs.
49,16,264/- and as per the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019 issued by the Director, (ITJ) Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, if the tax effect is upto Rs. 1 crore, the Appeal should be withdrawn.
2. Counsel for the appellant, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal.
3. The Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
_____________
RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.