Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Arun Kumar & Sons
High Court
04 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Arun Kumar & Sons
Date of order
04 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Arun Kumar & Sons, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal, therefore, succeeds and is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WTA 14/2005
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue.
versus
ARUN KUMAR & SONS
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. P. Roychaudhuri, Advocate
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
%
O R D E R04.01.2018
It is brought to the notice of the Court that the question of law framed in the case is whether the value of the land on which an incomplete building exists is to be excluded from the definition of “assets” under Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. An identical question was framed in the case of co-owner of the Society involved in the appeal Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs. Veena Rani, WTA 1 of 2004. The Court had disposed of that appeal by answering the question in favour of the Revenue on 03.08.2016. In doing so, the judgment on the identical question in Giridhar G. Yadalam vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, (2015) 17 SCC 664, was relied upon. WTA 14/2005 Page 1 of 2
Following the said judgment, the question of law framed in this case, is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The appeal, therefore, succeeds and is allowed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
JANUARY 04, 2018 nn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
WTA 14/2005
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.