Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Goodwi...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Goodwill India

High Court 20 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

20 Dec 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Del v. Goodwill India, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: 57.05 Lakhs as mentioned in the letter dated 20.11.2019 issued by ACIT, Judicial-2, New Delhi, the tax effect in the present appeal being below the permissible tax effect limit, the present appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 142/2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Adv. versus GOODWILL INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arta Trana Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 20.12.2019 Mr. Bhatia, on instructions, states that the tax effect in this matter is below Rs. 1 crore. In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/-; the tax effect of Rs. 57.05 Lakhs as mentioned in the letter dated 20.11.2019 issued by ACIT, Judicial-2, New Delhi, the tax effect in the present appeal being below the permissible tax effect limit, the present appeal is disposed of. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 20, 2019/N.Khanna SANJEEV NARULA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.