Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -15 v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -15 v. Matrix Infrastructure Through

High Court 20 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -15 v. Matrix Infrastructure Through
Date of order
20 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi -15 v. Matrix Infrastructure Through, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 18. + ITA 332/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI -15 ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel. versus MATRIX INFRASTRUCTURE Through ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 20.05.2016 % CM No.19628/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.19629/2016 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. ITA 332/2016 3. The tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. In view of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10[th] December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, this appeal has to be treated as not pressed by the Revenue. ITA 332/2016 Page 1 of 2 4. Although the appeal has been filed by invoking the exception in para 8 of the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015, the Court is of the considered view that the question involved is not covered by any of the exceptions. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 20, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 332/2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan