Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi v. M/S Chandraprabhu International

High Court 16 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi v. M/S Chandraprabhu International
Date of order
16 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi v. M/S Chandraprabhu International, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~42, 43, 45 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA Nos.450/2006, 917/2006, 974/2006 & 1408/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S CHANDRAPRABHU INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % O R D E R16.03.2017 The common question of law in these appeals is as follows: - “Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in its conclusion that the total turnover in Section 80 HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is only the turnover relating to the export business of the assessee and not a turnover relating to other businesses of the assessee irrespective of whether for the export business separate books of account have been maintained?” This Court had in its judgment (delivered on 16.02.2017) Rollatainers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITA 166/2004) answered the said question in favour of the assessee ITA Nos.450, 917, 974 & 1408/2006 Page 1 of 2 which had followed the Madras High Court ruling in CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd., 257 ITR 60. As a result, the question of law is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. ITA Nos.450/2006, 917/2006, 974/2006 and 1408/2006 are dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 16, 2017 /vikas/ NAJMI WAZIRI, J ITA Nos.450, 917, 974 & 1408/2006
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan