Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S Modi Rubber Ltd

High Court 03 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S Modi Rubber Ltd
Date of order
03 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/S Modi Rubber Ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of by answering the question in the negative i.e. in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 12. + ITA 135/2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr Ashok Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel. versus M/S MODI RUBBER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 03.02.2016 1. By an order dated 6[th] December, 2001, the Court framed the following substantial question of law for determination in this appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 31[st] August, 2000 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.6080/Del/1995 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 1998-99. “Whether the ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee is entitled to re-compute carry forward losses and allowances which have been set-off while calculating income under the normal provisions, on the ground that its income is taxable u/s 115J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?” ITA 135/2001 Page 1 of 2 2. The above question stands answered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee by the decision of the Supreme Court in Karnataka Small Scale Industries Development Corpn. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2002) 258 ITR 770 (SC). Accordingly, the impugned order of the ITAT is set aside to the above extent. 3. The appeal is disposed of by answering the question in the negative i.e. in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee. S.MURALIDHAR, J FEBRUARY 03, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 135/2001 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan