Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E v. Young Women's Christian Association Of Delhi
High Court
02 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E v. Young Women's Christian Association Of Delhi
Date of order
02 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E v. Young Women's Christian Association Of Delhi, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 509/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(E) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.Roy Chaudhuri, Advocate.
versus
YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R% 02.08.2016
CM No. 27557/2016 (Exemption)
1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM No. 27558/2016 (Condonation of delay in filing appeal)
2. For the reasons given in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
3. The application is allowed.
ITA 509/2016
4. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 15[th] February, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1019/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2009-10. The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) and sustained by the CIT(A) on account of income earned by the Respondent/Assessee from conducting casual and ‘non-recognized’ courses.
5. As pointed out in the impugned order of the ITAT itself, the issue stands covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this Court in Delhi Music Society vs. DGIT (2013) 357 ITR 265 (Del.). Consequently, no substantial question of law arises for determination.
6. The appeal is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
AUGUST 02, 2016kk
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.