Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) D...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Delhi v. Calorex Foundation

High Court 06 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Delhi v. Calorex Foundation
Date of order
06 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Delhi v. Calorex Foundation, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 18. + ITA 296/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel. versus CALOREX FOUNDATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ved Jain and Mr Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 06.05.2016 CM No.16767/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ITA 296/2016 2. The tax effect as stated by the Revenue is Rs.69,67,126/-. However, it is clarified that this is on a notional basis. The Assessing Officer assessed the total income of the Assessee as Rs.25,32,000/-. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the Assessee that even if the Revenue succeeds in the question urged in this appeal, the tax effect would be below Rs.20,00,000. ITA 296/2016 Page 1 of 2 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10[th] December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, this appeal has to be treated as not pressed by the Revenue. 4. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 06, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 296/2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan