Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption, Ja...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption, Jaipur v. Dali Bai Sewa Sansthan, Near Dali Bai Mandir, Chopasani By Pass Jodhpur (Rajasthan

High Court 03 Apr 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption, Jaipur v. Dali Bai Sewa Sansthan, Near Dali Bai Mandir, Chopasani By Pass Jodhpur (Rajasthan
Date of order
03 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption, Jaipur v. Dali Bai Sewa Sansthan, Near Dali Bai Mandir, Chopasani By Pass Jodhpur (Rajasthan, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal under Section 11, Section 12A, Section 80G, Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: At the time of registration of the Trust going by the binding judgments of the apex court, what is to be looked into is whether the Trust is a genuine one and whether it is a sham institution floated only to avail the benefits of exemption under the Act.

Decision: Consequently, the instant income tax appeal is hereby dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 40 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax-Exemption, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Dali Bai Sewa Sansthan, Near Dali Bai Mandir, Chopasani by Pass Jodhpur (Rajasthan) ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA Judgment Per Hon’ble Mr. G.K. Vyas, J. 03/04/2018 In this income tax appeal filed by appellant- C.I.T. (E), Jaipur under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’), the judgment dated 22.05.2017 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur (ITAT) in I.T.A. No.125/Jodh/2017, is under challenge. As per facts of the case, the respondent/assessee- Dali Bai Sewa Sansthan, Jodhpur, a Trust, filed an application for exemption under Section 12AA in Form No.10-A and Section 80G in Form No.10G of the Act on 19.08.2016. The said application filed under Section 12AA of the Act as also under Section 80G of the Act was rejected by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur vide its order dated 02.02.2017 as the registration under Section 12A and12AA by notification u/s 23 (c) is pre-condition for granting approval u/s 80G of the Act. Being aggrieved by the rejection order u/s 12A of the Act dated 02.02.2017, the respondent/assessee preferred appeal before the learned ITAT, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur and the same was allowed by the learned ITAT vide its order dated 22.05.2017 whereby the learned ITAT while considering the provisions of Section 12A of the Act, observed that it is clear from a plain reading of sections 12A and 12AA of the Act that what is intended thereby is only a registration simpliciter of the entity of a Trust. This has been made a condition precedent for claiming of benefits under the other provisions of the Act regarding exemption of income, contribution etc. No examination of the modus of the application of the funds of the Trust or an examination of the ethical background of its settlers is called for while considering an application for registration. The stage for consideration of the reliance of the object of the Trust and the application of its funds arises at the time of assessment. Where benefits are claimed by assessee in terms of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act, the question as to the nature of such contribution and income can be looked into. At the time of registration of the Trust going by the binding judgments of the apex court, what is to be looked into is whether the Trust is a genuine one and whether it is a sham institution floated only to avail the benefits of exemption under the Act. The learned ITAT held that there is no such finding in the impugned order passed by the assessing authority and CIT (E), Jaipur. We have examined the detailed objects of the Trust, which was taken into consideration by the learned ITAT, which are reproduced herein below: - “1- ;kf=;ksa ds fy, Hkkstu] ikuh o Bgjus dh fu%”kqYd O;oLFkk djukA 2- Hkknok ekg ds esys ds nkSjku ;kf=;ksa ds fy, fu%”kqYd fpfdRlk lqfo/kk miyC?k djkus gsrq f”kfoj yxkus dh O;oLFkk djukA Hkknok ekg ds esys ds nkSjku ;kf=;ksa ds fy, fu%”kqYd fpfdRlk lqfo/kk miyC?k djkus gsrq f”kfoj yxkus dh O;oLFkk djukA 3- Mkyh ckbZ efUnj esa jkf= tkxj.k] lHkk] lRlax dk vk;kstu djokuk rFkk bl gsrq es?koky lekt ds izfrf’Br O;fDr;ksa lk/kq larksa dks cqykukA djokuk rFkk bl gsrq es?koky lekt ds izfrf’Br O;fDr;ksa lk/kq larksa dks cqykukA 4- i;kZoj.k dh lqj{kk gsrq isM+&ikS/ks yxkukA i;kZoj.k dh lqj{kk gsrq isM+&ikS/ks yxkukA 5- xjhc ekuo dh gj rjg ls lsok djukA 6- es?koky lekt esa f”k{kk dk izpkj o izlkj djuk] cky fookg jksduk] dqjhfr;ksa dks feVkus dk iz;Ru djukA dqjhfr;ksa dks feVkus dk iz;Ru djukA 7- ladV ds le; esa jkT; ljdkj dk lg;ksx djuk o lg;ksx ysukA 8-laLFkk dh py ,oa vpy lEifRr dh j{kk ,oa ns[kHkky djukA 3- Mkyh ckbZ efUnj esa jkf= tkxj.k] lHkk] lRlax dk vk;kstu djokuk rFkk bl gsrq es?koky lekt ds izfrf’Br O;fDr;ksa lk/kq larksa dks cqykukA djokuk rFkk bl gsrq es?koky lekt ds izfrf’Br O;fDr;ksa lk/kq larksa dks cqykukA 4- i;kZoj.k dh lqj{kk gsrq isM+&ikS/ks yxkukA i;kZoj.k dh lqj{kk gsrq isM+&ikS/ks yxkukA 5- xjhc ekuo dh gj rjg ls lsok djukA 6- es?koky lekt esa f”k{kk dk izpkj o izlkj djuk] cky fookg jksduk] dqjhfr;ksa dks feVkus dk iz;Ru djukA dqjhfr;ksa dks feVkus dk iz;Ru djukA 7- ladV ds le; esa jkT; ljdkj dk lg;ksx djuk o lg;ksx ysukA 8-laLFkk dh py ,oa vpy lEifRr dh j{kk ,oa ns[kHkky djukA mijksDr mn~ns';ksa dh iwfrZ esa dksbZ ykHk fufgr ugha gSA” Upon perusal of the above objects, and the findings of the learned ITAT, we are of the opinion that the assessee- Trust was created in the memory of late Dali Bali, who was sister of Baba Ramdev (yksd nsork). The people of the Trust had a vision to provide relief to poor and from the study of its trust-deed, it reveals that the maximum number of members and trustees are from scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and other backward classes of rural areas. The members of the society are illiterate and coming from different villages. They follow late Dali Bai as goddess. The history of Dali Bai is placed on record. In view of above, we are of the opinion that no error has been committed by the learned ITAT, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in allowing the appeal filed by the respondent/assessee and directing the C.I.T. (E), Jaipur to grant registration u/s 12AA & 80G of the Act to the assessee with effect from filing of its application. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Consequently, the instant income tax appeal is hereby dismissed. (RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA) J. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS) J. DJ/- 40
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan