Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Dhan Mandi, Gajsinghpur
High Court
07 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Dhan Mandi, Gajsinghpur
Date of order
07 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Dhan Mandi, Gajsinghpur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 32/2015
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Dhan Mandi, Gajsinghpur
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
07/01/2019
Judgment
The present appeal has been admitted on 07.11.2016 andfollowing question of law has been formulated :-
“Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JodhpurBench, Jodhpur under the judgment impugned is justifiedwhile deciding the appeal in the light of judgmentsreferred in para 7 of the judgment impugned ignoring thefact that there was non-compliance on the part of theassessee regarding submission of form NO.10 under Rule17 of the Rules for accumulation of Income or exemptionunder section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”
Today, we have dismissed connected appeal of theDepartment being DB Income Tax Appeal No.168/2018 involvingidentical question of law by a detailed order.
In light of the reasoning given therein, the present appeal isdismissed.
The question formulated aforesaid is answered in the mannerthat the Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the appealfiled by the assessee.
(DINESH MEHTA),J(SANGEET LODHA),J
24-ArunV/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.