Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) -...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) - Jaipur v. M/S Shri Ram Niwas Dham Trust

High Court 13 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) - Jaipur v. M/S Shri Ram Niwas Dham Trust
Date of order
13 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) - Jaipur v. M/S Shri Ram Niwas Dham Trust, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed. ,J. , J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JODHPUR J U D G M E N T D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.120/2015 Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) - JaipurVersusM/s Shri Ram Niwas Dham Trust Date of Judgment :: 13.04.2016 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. K.K. Bissa, with Mr. Gajendra Singh Chouhan, for the appellant BY THE COURT : It is well settled that in computing income of acharitable institution/trust, depreciation of assets owned by suchan institution is a necessary deduction on commercial principles,hence, the amount of depreciation has to be deducted to arrive atthe income available. This view is substantiated by a Division Benchjudgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-II, JodhpurVs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Jaisalmer (D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.32/2010, decided on 16.1.2015). In view of it, we are of the considered opinion that thisappeal does not involve any substantial question of law thatdeserves adjudication by this Court. The appeal is dismissed. ,J. , J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan