Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Bureau Of Indian Standards
High Court
03 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Bureau Of Indian Standards
Date of order
03 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Bureau Of Indian Standards, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 518/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
Through
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 03.08.2016
..... Respondent
-CM No. 27708/2016 (condonation of delay in refiling)
1. For the reasons given in the application the delay in re-filing of the appeal is condoned.
2. The applications are allowed.
ITA No. 518/2016
3. This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 17[th] April, 2015 passed in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 2174/Del/2013 relating to the Assessment Year 2009-10.
4. The question urged by the Revenue in this appeal is covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the decision dated 27[th] September, 2012 passed by this Court in W.P (C) 1755/2012 in the Assessee’s own case
allowing it the exemption under Section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
5. No substantial question of law arises for consideration of this Court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
AUGUST 03, 2016 kk
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.