Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Society Of Indian Automobile Manufacturers
High Court
14 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Society Of Indian Automobile Manufacturers
Date of order
14 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption v. Society Of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 857/2016, C.M. APPL.44601/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)..... AppellantThrough : Sh. P. Roychaudhuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.
versus
SOCIETY OF INDIAN AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS
..... Respondent
Through : Sh. Gaurav Jain and Ms. Bhavita, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R% 14.12.2016
In this appeal, the Revenue urges that the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is incorrect.
The assessee was incorporated with the object of promoting awareness and information dissemination with respect to automobile industry and is also engaged in advocacy in that industry. For the relevant year, it reported receipt of some amounts towards fees for conducting seminars and other like activity.
The Assessing Officer (AO) felt that since the assessee was engaged in providing commercial activity, the proviso to Section 2(15) was attracted. The ITAT ruled – on the basis of this Court’s
judgments in India Trade Promotion Organization v. DGIT 2015 (374) ITR 333 and Institution of Chartered Accounts v. DGIT(E)2013 (358) ITR 91 (Del) that the mere circumstance of collection of such amounts did not result in the assessee losing its essential character of being established for charitable purposes.
We are of the opinion that the ITAT’s decision is sound in law and facts. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DECEMBER 14, 2016 ájk
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.