Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions),...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Indo Soviet Friendship College Of Pharmacy

High Court 30 Oct 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Indo Soviet Friendship College Of Pharmacy
Date of order
30 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh v. M/S Indo Soviet Friendship College Of Pharmacy, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 9377 and 9378-CII/2020 in ITANo.172/2016 and CM Nos.9370 and 9374-CII/2020 in ITA No.165/2016are accepted and the aforesaid appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA NO.187 OF 2016(O&M) and others 1 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) ITA NO.187 OF 2016 (O&M),(2) ITA No.172/2016 (O&M) and(3)ITA No.165/2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30/10/2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH.......... Appellant Versus M/S INDO SOVIET FRIENDSHIP COLLEGE OF PHARMACY .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANT PARKASH Present: Mr. S.K.Mukhi Advocate for the Applicant /Respondents JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) [The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencingsince the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court.] This order shall dispose of aforesaid three appeals as thesame involve identical facts and circumstances. In the present appeals filed by Revenue challenge is tocommon order dated 28/09/2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarh allowed Income Tax Appeal No.444,445,478/ CHD/2013 pertaining to the assesment years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 filed by the Respondent – Assessee and set-aside theadditions made by the Assessing Officer in the income of the Assessee as under : Assesment year 2006-07 (ITA 444/2013) Rs.5 Lacs. ITA NO.187 OF 2016(O&M) and others 2 107 Assesment year 2007-08 (ITA 445/2013) Rs.8 Lacs. Assesment year 2008-09 (ITA 478/2013) Rs.91.40 Lacs Aggreived against the said common order dated 28/09/2015(Annexure A-3) the Revenue has filed three appeals bearing ITA nos.165/2016, 172/2016 and 187/2016 which are pending adjudication. Now Respondent Assessee has filed two sets of appplicationsin all these appeals, i.e., one is for placing on record circular andnotifications as Annexure R-1 to R-3 showing that Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes vide these Circularshas raised the Monetary Limit for filing appeals by Revenue beforedifferent fora, whereas in the other applications the prayer is for dismissalof the aforesaid appeals in view of Annexure R-1 to R-3. Notice of the applications to Sh.Denesh Goyal,Advocate for the appellant/ Revenue. Mr.Goyal, in view of Annexures R-1 to R-3, fairely concedesthat the monetary limit involved in the aforesaid appeals is below therevised limit, as fixed by the Ministry of Revenue, for filing said appealsbefore this Court and hence the aforesaid applications are liable to beaccepted and appeals dismissed. Besides, he has also sent through emailcopy of letter dated 29.10.2020 of Govt. of India, Income Tax Department,concerning these three appeals. Copy of the the said letter is taken onrecord. It is stated therein that revised monetary limits so mentioned inCircular 17/2019 is applicable, to all pending SLPs/Appeals/ crossobjections/ references. ITA NO.187 OF 2016(O&M) and others 3 107 application Annexure R/2 shows that the limit for filing appeals before thisCourt is Rs.1 crore. As noticed above, the monetary limit involved in theaforesaid three appeals is much below the prescribed limit of Rs.1 crore. In view of the above factual position, ITA Nos. 187, 172 and165 of 2016, on the oral request of the counsel for the parties are preponedand taken up for hearing today itself. For the reasons stated above, CM Nos.9369 and 9375-CII/2020 in ITA No.187/2016, CM Nos. 9377 and 9378-CII/2020 in ITANo.172/2016 and CM Nos.9370 and 9374-CII/2020 in ITA No.165/2016are accepted and the aforesaid appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. A copy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases. ( JASWANT SINGH )JUDGE October 30,2020.Joshi ( SANT PARKASH )JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan