Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. National Accreditation Board For Testing And Calibration Laboratories
High Court
02 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. National Accreditation Board For Testing And Calibration Laboratories
Date of order
02 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. National Accreditation Board For Testing And Calibration Laboratories, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The short question is whether the Respondent National Accreditation Board For Testing and Calibration Laboratories is entitled to exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
26
+ ITA 284/2016
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI
..... Appellant
Through Mr P. Roychaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel. versus
NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES
..... Respondent
Through
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 02.05.2016
CM 15851/2016
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
ITA 284/2016
2. This is an appeal against the order dated 26[th] November, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 1115/Del/2013 for Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2009-10.
3. The short question is whether the Respondent National Accreditation Board For Testing and Calibration Laboratories is entitled to exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITA 284/2016 Page 1 of 2
4. The positive findings of the ITAT on facts is that the Assessee is not engaged in trade, commerce and business and its dominant and prime objective is charitable in nature in accordance with Section 2(15) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Court also notes that the Respondent is part of the central government. The Court is unable to be persuaded to hold that the findings of the ITAT are perverse. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed.
5. We also further observe that the Respondent Assessee is a charitable institution.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 02, 2016
pkv
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
ITA 284/2016 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.