Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur v. M/S Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
High Court
07 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur v. M/S Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
Date of order
07 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur v. M/S Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAJudgment 07/01/2019 The present appeal has been admitted on 10.02.2017 andfollowing question of law has been formulated :- “Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JodhpurBench, Jodhpur under the impugned judgment, is justifiedwhile deciding the appeal in the light of judgment...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 55/2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sri Bijaynagar
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAJudgment
07/01/2019
The present appeal has been admitted on 10.02.2017 andfollowing question of law has been formulated :-
“Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JodhpurBench, Jodhpur under the impugned judgment, is justifiedwhile deciding the appeal in the light of judgment given inthe case of M/s. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Grain),Sriganganagar and M/s. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Gajsinghpur in ITA Nos.124 & 125/Jodh/2014 date07.08.2014, ignoring the fact that there was non-compliance on the part of the assessee regardingsubmission of Form No.10 under Rule 17 of the Rules foraccumulation of income or exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act?”
Today, we have dismissed connected appeal of theDepartment being DB Income Tax Appeal No.168/2018 involvingidentical question of law by a detailed order.
In light of the reasoning given therein, the present appeal isdismissed.
The question formulated aforesaid is answered in the manner
that the Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the appealfiled by the assessee. .
(DINESH MEHTA),J(SANGEET LODHA),J
26-ArunV/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.