Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Vidya Bharti Trust

High Court 09 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Vidya Bharti Trust
Date of order
09 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Vidya Bharti Trust, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: KARIA Date : 09/05/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

C/TAXAP/477/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 477 of 2018 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)VersusVIDYA BHARTI TRUST ==========================================================Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 09/05/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied of Rs. 24,47,738/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, 1961 on disallowance of 15% accumulation and disallowance of claim of earmarked fund being corpus fund ?” 2.Issue thus pertains to imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The documents on record would show that the Assessing Officer having levied such penalty, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both deleted C/TAXAP/477/2018 ORDER such penalty on the ground that there was computation of arrear on the part of the assessee which was bona-fide and the issue was debatable. 3.No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed. (AKIL KURESHI, J) ANKIT SHAH (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan