Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Motorola India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
08 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Motorola India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Motorola India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Income-tax Appeal No. 225Date of decision: 8.12.2010
of 2007
Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad
...Appellant
Versus
M/s Motorola India Pvt. Ltd.
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate for the respondent.
****
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J (
Oral).
This appeal has been preferred under Section 260-A ofIncome Tax Act, 1961 by the revenue against order dated 22.9.2006 ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench-A, passed in ITANo.911/BANG/03 in respect of assessment year 1996-97.
Learned counsel for the assessee points out that in case of theassessee itself (IT appeal Nos.44 & 45 of 2005 (Commissioner of IncomeTax Vs. Motorola India Ltd) decided on 3.10.2007, it was held that thisCourt has no territorial jurisdiction when orders of the assessing officer,CIT(A) and the Tribunal were out side the jurisdiction of this Court i.e. atBangalore.
Learned counsel for the revenue is unable to dispute theapplicability of the judgment relied upon on behalf of the assessee.
In view of the above, we dispose of this appeal in the same
terms.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge
December 08,2010Pka
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.