Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Hukmi(Huf), Vill.wazirabad, Gurgaon
High Court
03 May 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Hukmi(Huf), Vill.wazirabad, Gurgaon
Date of order
03 May 2010
Assessment year(s)
1996-97
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Hukmi(Huf), Vill.wazirabad, Gurgaon, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 668 of 2008
Date of Decision: May 03, 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad......Appellant
Versus
Shri Hukmi(HUF), Vill.Wazirabad, Gurgaon......Respondent
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
M. M. Kumar, J.
The instant appeal is directed against order dated 29.2.2008passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for brevity 'The Tribunal')Delhi Bench in ITA No. 2582/Delhi/2004 for Assessment Year 1996-97.The Tribunal has remanded the mater back to the Assessing Officer. It hasnow been stated by the learned counsel for the parties that after the remandto the Assessing Officer the matter has been decided in favour of therevenue and the assessee-respondent has filed an appeal before the CIT(A),which has been decided in favour of the revenue. Ms. Dhugga, learnedcounsel for the revenue, accordingly does not wish to press the appeal as the
ITA No. 668 of 2008
same has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
May 03, 2010sunita
(M.M.KUMAR)JUDGE
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue