Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Swaroop Singh, Huf

High Court 12 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

12 Nov 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Swaroop Singh, Huf, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-879-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.11.2018 Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad Versus ....Appellant. Shri Swaroop Singh, HUF ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL. PRESENT: Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Parshad, Advocate and Mr. B.M. Monga, Advocate for the respondent. *** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. For orders, see ITA-569-2008 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Shri Swaroop Singh, HUF). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE November 12, 2018gbs (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.