Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot

High Court 24 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot
Date of order
24 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 380 of 2018 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHINAGARVersusSUVAS HITENDRA BAROT ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 24/04/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.The Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15.09.2017 raising the following questions of law for our consideration; “Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and in facts in deleting the addition made by the AO with respect to addition on unaccounted investment in Bhavya Group-Rs.95,02,871/- ?” 2.The issue arises out of block assessment proceedings. The Assessing Officer has made an addition of a sum of Rs.95.02 laks (rounded off) C/TAXAP/380/2018 ORDER in the hands of the assessee by way of unaccounted investment in one Bhavya Group of entities. The Tribunal, however, held and observed that in the loose papers found during the search, the name of the assessee nowhere appeared. During the search, the statements of the representatives of Bhavya Group were also recorded, who had denied the contents of the documents impounded. The Tribunal noted that against Bhavya Group, in respect of the notice found in such papers, no account was taken. In view of such facts, the Tribunal concluded that the papers merely contained some notings but, in any case, did not involve the assessee. The issue is purely factual in nature. No question of law arises. The Tax Appeal is dismissed. (AKIL KURESHI, J) PRAVIN KARUNAN (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan