Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot

High Court 24 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot
Date of order
24 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Suvas Hitendra Barot, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: KARIA Date : 24/04/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.The Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the following question of law for our consideration; (A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in not cons...

Decision: Hence, the Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 372 of 2018 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHINAGARVersusSUVAS HITENDRA BAROT ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 24/04/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.The Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the following question of law for our consideration; (A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in not considering the seized material and deleting the addition in respect of unaccounted investment of Rs.18,50,000/- in respect of New York Tower ? (B) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in not considering the seized material and deleting the addition in respect of unaccounted investment in Somvilla amounting to Rs.22,50,000/- ? (C) Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in not considering the seized material and deleting the addition in C/TAXAP/372/2018 ORDER respect of unaccounted investment in Mansi Complex amounting to Rs.38,96,757/- ? 2.The issue pertains to the alleged unaccounted investment by the assessee in three separate immovable properties. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal concurrently came to the conclusion that the materials on record did not establish any such unaccounted investments. No question of law arises. Hence, the Tax Appeal is dismissed. (AKIL KURESHI, J) PRAVIN KARUNAN (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan