Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Jind Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd
High Court
12 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Jind Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd
Date of order
12 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Jind Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 12.9.2011
(i)ITA No. 250 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar
…..Appellant
vs.
Jind Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd.
…..Respondent
(ii)ITA No. 251 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar…..Appellant
vs.
Jind Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd.
…..Respondent
CORAM: -HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTAHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present: - Mr. Tejinder K. Joshi, Advocate
for the appellant.
HEMANT GUPTA, J
This order shall dispose of ITA No. 250 and 251 of2011 arising out of a common order passed on 1.11.2010 inrespect of Assessment years 2001-2002 and 2007-2008. Whilepassing the impugned order, learned Tribunal has relied uponits earlier judgment for the assessment year 2005-2006 dated19.6.2009. The appeal bearing ITA No. 694 of 2010 againstthe order passed for the assessment year 2005-2006 has sincebeen dismissed by this Court on 14.12.2010.
In view of the said fact, we find that no substantial
question of law is involved in the present appeal.
Dismissed.
(HEMANT GUPTA)JUDGE
12.9.2011preeti
(JASWANT SINGH)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue