Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Hisar v. Mar...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Hisar v. Market Committee, Jakhal

High Court 28 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Hisar v. Market Committee, Jakhal
Date of order
28 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Hisar v. Market Committee, Jakhal, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of above, no substantial question of law arises.The appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Income-tax Appeal No.825 of 2010-1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Income-tax Appeal No.825of 2010 Date of decision: 28.1.2011 Commissioner of Income-Tax, Hisar ...Appellant Versus Market Committee, Jakhal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant. **** ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J (Oral). 1.This Appeal has been preferred by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as“the Act”) against order dated 18.6.2009 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'F', New Delhi in ITANo.1411/Del/09, for the assessment year 2006-07, raising followingsubstantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the learned CIT(A) was justified inallowing payment of 30% of Market fees earned byit paid to Haryana Agricultural Marketing Board asapplication of income for charitable purpose, despitethe finding that 30% of the market fee has to be **** paid to the said Board as a statutory obligationunder the Agricultural Marketing Board Act, and,therefore, it is not application of income, but it issharing of Income by an overriding title as per theAct by which the Market Committee is governed?”Learned counsel for the revenue very fairly states thatquestion raised has been decided against the revenue by this Courtvide order dated 5.7.2010 in ITA No.151 of 2010 (Commissioner ofIncome-Tax, Hisar Vs. Market Committee, Narwana). In view of above, no substantial question of law arises.The appeal is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge January 28,2011Pka (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan