Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Nishant Choudhary
High Court
14 Jul 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Nishant Choudhary
Date of order
14 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hisar v. Nishant Choudhary, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The only issue is whether such a contention couldhave been taken for the first time before the CIT (Appeals).
Decision: 3 |Prima-facie, at least there is nothing that prevented the assesseefrom taking such a contention before the CIT (Appeals).4The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITA4372014 (O&M)Date of decision:14 072015
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar
..Appellant
Versus
Nishant Choudhary
...Respondent
CORAMHONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SAANDHAWALI
Present: Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate,
for the appellant.
ee
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (QRAL)
This is an appeal against the order of the Tribunal |dated 08.03.2013 atftirming the order of the CIT (Appeals).
The matter pertains to the assessment year 2007-2008.
2 |The respondent/assessee received enhanced compensation in viewof an order under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1881. However,admittedly the land in question was agricultural land. That has not beenchallenged. The compensation is, therefore, not liable to be taxed. Thus, onmerits, there is no case. The only issue is whether such a contention couldhave been taken for the first time before the CIT (Appeals). It does notappear from the order that this technical ground was pressed before theTribunal, though it has been raised in the memo of appeal. There has beenno application by the appellant for modification of the order before theTribunal either.
3 |Prima-facie, at least there is nothing that prevented the assesseefrom taking such a contention before the CIT (Appeals).4The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) |JUDGE|
14.07.2015
Amodh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.