Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/S Jagtu Mal Kundan Lal, Jagat Theatre Complex, Sec 17, Chandigarh

High Court 05 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/S Jagtu Mal Kundan Lal, Jagat Theatre Complex, Sec 17, Chandigarh
Date of order
05 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh v. M/S Jagtu Mal Kundan Lal, Jagat Theatre Complex, Sec 17, Chandigarh, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.229 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:05.03.2014 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh versus .... Appellant M/s Jagtu Mal Kundan Lal, Jagat Theatre Complex, Sec 17, Chandigarh .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocatefor the respondent.***** Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.(Oral)-CM No.4247CII of 2014 Allowed as prayed for. -CM No.4248CII of 2014 This is an application for placing on record DVO Report dated 21.03.2013 (Annexure A-4) and Assessment order dated 28.03.2013. The application is allowed and DVO Report dated 21.03.2013 (Annexure A-4) and Assessment Order dated 28.03.2013 are taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate place. CM stands disposed of. Main case 1.Learned counsel for Revenue has produced two separate communications dated 03.03.2014 and 04.03.2014 respectively received from the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh. Copies of communications are taken on record. 2.In view of the aforesaid communications, learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that the appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has become infructuous. In view of the communications received by the learned counsel, she prayed that the appeal filed by the Revenue before this Court be dismissed as withdrawn. 3.In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 05.03.2014sonia (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan