Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Chandigarh...

Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited, Chandigarh

High Court 01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited, Chandigarh
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited, Chandigarh, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited,(2008)300 ITR 24 and it has been held that income of the CooperativeBank towards interest derived from loan advanced tomembers/nominal members will not be income from other sourcesbut will be income from banking business eligible for exemptionunder section 80P(2...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. ITA No.210 of 2009(O&M)Date of decision: 01.7.2009 Commissioner of Income Tax I, Chandigarh -----Appellant Vs. M/s Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited, Chandigarh Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:-Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Standing Counsel for the revenue. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. 1.Delay in refilling the appeal is condoned. 2.This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’)against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarh, Bench ‘B’ dated 21.6.2006 in ITA No.454/Chandi/2005 for the assessment year 2003-04, proposingto raise following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Hon’ble ITAT was right in law in holding thatincome earned from banking business with ‘nominal’ members is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?” 3.Learned counsel for the revenue submits that identicalissue has already been decided by this Court inCommissioner of Income Tax v. Punjab State Cooperative Bank Limited,(2008)300 ITR 24 and it has been held that income of the CooperativeBank towards interest derived from loan advanced tomembers/nominal members will not be income from other sourcesbut will be income from banking business eligible for exemptionunder section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.4.In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge July 1, 2009‘gs’ (Daya Chaudhary)Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan