Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Chennai v. M/S. Milliennium Software Productions(India) Pvt. Ltd

T.C.A.Nos.107, 108, 111, 1244, 1245 and 1248 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ T.C.A.Nos.107, 108, 111, 1244, 1245 and 1248 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax Central I ... Appellant in TCA.Nos.107, 108 and 111 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax - I, Chennai. ... Appellant in TCA.Nos.1244, 1245 and 1248 of 2010 Versus M/s. Milliennium Software Productions(India) Pvt. Ltd., 1, Kuppusamy Street, T Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. ... Respondent in all TCAs Appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "D" and “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 05.06.2009 and 30.04.2010 in I.T.A.Nos.1854, 1855 and 1858/Mds/2008 and I.T.A.Nos.345, 346 and 349 /Mds/2010. COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / Revenue, challenging the common orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 05.06.2009 and 30.04.2010 in I.T.A.Nos.1854, 1855 and 1858/Mds/2008 and I.T.A.Nos.345, 346 and 349 /Mds/2010, relating to the assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2006-07. 2.By order dated 21.02.2011, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case appeals on the following substantial question of law: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10A for the Assessment Year under consideration in respect of the old unit in No.1, Kuppusamy Street, T.Nagar, Chennai 17, which is not in the Software Technology Park, on the basis of the letter of approval dated 20.03.2001 issued by the Software T.C.A.Nos.107, 108, 111, 1244, 1245 and 1248 of 2010 Technology Park of India (STPI), Chennai for setting up a new undertaking at No.9, Krishna Iyer Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai?" 3. When these matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in these appeals is less than the threshold limit. 4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. (R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)27.06.2022 Internet : YesIndex : Yes / No R. MAHADEVAN, J.and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. av To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “D” Bench. 2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “B” Bench. 3. Commissioner of Income Tax Central I. 4. Commissioner of Income Tax - I, Chennai. Chennai. 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1 (4), Chennai. Central Circle 1 (4), Chennai. 6. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Chennai. T.C.A.Nos.107, 108, 111, 1244, 1245 and 1248 of 2010