Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jaipur v. M/S Baid Leasing & Finance Co. Ltd., Jaipur
High Court
10 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jaipur v. M/S Baid Leasing & Finance Co. Ltd., Jaipur
Date of order
10 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Jaipur v. M/S Baid Leasing & Finance Co. Ltd., Jaipur, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(1) DB CIVIL RESTORATION APPLN.310/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR
O R D E R
D.B.CIVIL RESTORATION APPLICATION NO.310/2012
IND.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.122/2006
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, JAIPURVs.
M/s BAID LEASING & FINANCE CO. LTD., JAIPUR
DATE:10.07.2012
'-HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINIHON'BLE MISS JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Mr. J.K. Singhi, Senior Counsel assisted byMr. Anuroop Singhi andMr. Ramit Pareek,for the applicant/appellant. ****
Heard learned counsel for theappellant and afterconsideringhissubmissions and for the reasons mentioned inthe applications, dulysupportedbyaffidavits of Advocate, we are satisfied thatsufficient cause is made out to condone thedelay and to restore the appeal.
Consequently, both the applicationsare allowed. Delay in filing the applicationis condoned and D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.122/2006 is restored to its originalnumber, subject to condition that appellantshall pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as costs. Incase, appellant deposits Rs.1,000/- as costswith the Rajasthan State Legal Services
(2) DB CIVIL RESTORATION APPLN.310/2012
Authority within 15 days from today, theappeal shall stand restored to its originalnumber.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J.
/KKC/
Certificate:
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in thejudgment/order being emailed.
KAMLESH KUMARP.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.