In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. Mack Hosiery (Regd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The revenue has claimed the following substantial question oflaw: “Whether on the facts and law, the Hon'ble Income taxAppellate Tribunal was justified in holding that duty drawbackof Rs.15,04,103/- was `profit derived from industrialundertaking' entitled to deduction u/s 80IB of I.T.Act, 1961?
Decision: In view of the above, the appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 618 of 2007Date of Decision: 1.12.2011
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana
Versus
...Petitioner
Mack Hosiery (Regd.)
..Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia
Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
Hemant Gupta, J.
The revenue has claimed the following substantial question oflaw:
“Whether on the facts and law, the Hon'ble Income taxAppellate Tribunal was justified in holding that duty drawbackof Rs.15,04,103/- was `profit derived from industrialundertaking' entitled to deduction u/s 80IB of I.T.Act, 1961? The said question of law is said to have arisen out of the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal vide its order dated 30.6.2006in ITA No.162/Chandi/2005 for the assessment year 2001-02.
Learned counsel for the parties admit that the question raised isconcluded by the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Liberty India
Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2009) 317 ITR 218(SC) in favour ofthe revenue and against the assessee.
In view of the above, the appeal is allowed. Substantialquestion of law is decided in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
( Hemant Gupta )Judge
1.12.2011Meenu
(G.S. Sandhawalia)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.