Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Exports, Ludhiana
High Court
21 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Exports, Ludhiana
Date of order
21 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Exports, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 214 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 21.4.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana
....Appellant.
Versus
M/s Dimple Exports, Ludhiana
...Respondent.
1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
For orders, see ITA No. 213 of 2011 (Commissioner of
Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/s Dimple Exports, Ludhiana).
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
April 21, 2016gbs
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue