Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Knitwear
High Court
26 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Knitwear
Date of order
26 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Dimple Knitwear, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 47 of 2012 (O&M)Decided on : 26.04.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana
Versus
M/s Dimple Knitwear
... Appellant
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITIALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
PRESENT: Mr. Raejsh Katoch, Advocatefor the appellant.
Ms. Prerna, Advocate for|Mr. S.K.Mukhi, Advocatefor the respondent.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue States that the tax effectinvolved in the present case is less than the monetary limit prescribed videcircular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. Hefurther submitted that keeping in view the aforesaid circular, the presentappeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty be granted to therevenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case somethingsurvives therein|
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to beaffirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue asclaimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate
Case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.