Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Hero Cycles Ltd., Ludhiana
High Court
01 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Hero Cycles Ltd., Ludhiana
Date of order
01 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana v. M/S Hero Cycles Ltd., Ludhiana, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: ITA3502004 The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with libertyaforesaid.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CM4693CI]2021 and CM4694CI]2021 in/andITA3502004 (O&M)
-|-
1O1L-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CM-4693-CI[-2021 andCM-4694-CI[-2021 in/andITA-350-2004 (O&M)Date of decision : 01.07.2021
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Ludhiana
...Appellant
Versus
M/s Hero Cycles Ltd., Ludhiana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present:Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate and
Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the applicant-respondent.
(Through Video Conferencing)
6666
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
CMF"#$%;CI]F202
This is an application for placing on record Form-3 asAnnexure A-4.
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same isallowed. Form-3 (Annexure A-4) is taken on record.
CMF"#$";CllF2021
This is an application for withdrawal of the appeal in view ofthe fact that the respondent has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se VishwasScheme with further liberty to revive the same in case the settlement does
CM4693CI]2021 and CM4694CI]2021 in/andITA3502004 (O&M)
-)-
not operationalized.
Application is allowed and the main appeal is taken up on
Board today itself.
ITA3502004
The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with libertyaforesaid.
Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, thepending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, also stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE
01.07.2021Pawan
(VIKAS BAHL)JUDGEH
Whether speaking/reasoned:-
Yes/No
Whether reportable:-
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.