Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. M/S Datta Meghe Institute Of Medical Science, Nagpur

High Court 10 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

10 Nov 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. M/S Datta Meghe Institute Of Medical Science, Nagpur, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

incometax44of2008.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (T) NO. 25/2017 IN INCOME TAX No. 44 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur V/s M/s Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Nagpur. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Petitioner.Shri L.S. Dewani, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM: B.P.Dharmadhikari & P.N. Deshmukh, JJDATED : 10/11/2017. Heard. Perused application, which is supported by the knowledge of learned counsel. We do not see any oblique motive. Hence,thoughlearnedcounsel Shri Parchure is objecting, as no prejudice would be caused to the appellant, we recall order dated 26/8/2015 and permit respondent to participate on merits of the adjudication. Consequently, order dated 12/03/2015 does not survive. JUDGEJUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.